12:40

смерти нет (с)

Theoretical scope
Mary Parker Follett (1868–1933), who wrote on the topic in the early twentieth century, defined management as "the art of getting things done through people". She also described management as philosophy.[2] One can also think of management functionally, as the action of measuring a quantity on a regular basis and of adjusting some initial plan; or as the actions taken to reach one's intended goal. This applies even in situations where planning does not take place. From this perspective, Frenchman Henri Fayol[3] considers management to consist of seven functions:
1.planning
2.organizing
3.leading
4.co-ordinating
5.controlling
6.staffing
7.motivating
Some people, however, find this definition, while useful, far too narrow. The phrase "management is what managers do" occurs widely, suggesting the difficulty of defining management, the shifting nature of definitions, and the connection of managerial practices with the existence of a managerial cadre or class.
One habit of thought regards management as equivalent to "business administration" and thus excludes management in places outside commerce, as for example in charities and in the public sector. More realistically, however, every organization must manage its work, people, processes, technology, etc. in order to maximize its effectiveness. Nonetheless, many people refer to university departments which teach management as "business schools." Some institutions (such as the Harvard Business School) use that name while others (such as the Yale School of Management) employ the more inclusive term "management."
English speakers may also use the term "management" or "the management" as a collective word describing the managers of an organization, for example of a corporation. Historically this use of the term was often contrasted with the term "Labor" referring to those being managed.

Комментарии
11.10.2009 в 14:00

троллфейс
how is this defenition narrow, when it covers most of what a normal, sane person can possible do? XD
11.10.2009 в 15:26

смерти нет (с)
ммм... Тань, а если по-русски? ;)
11.10.2009 в 15:28

троллфейс
::Кривляка:: ну...как бэ если у тебя текст по англицки, то и ответ будет таким же : 3

кстате я там опечаталась: *possibly
11.10.2009 в 15:38

смерти нет (с)
AkiraIn просто я его сюда впихнула дабы комп не засорять..итак памти мало(((
11.10.2009 в 19:43

троллфейс
::Кривляка:: текст память не сожрет : 3 одна песенка раз в 10, а то и 20 занимает больше места, чем кусочек текста))

ну я понимаю, но раз у тебя есть ентот текст, значит ты должна его понимать, нэ?)
11.10.2009 в 22:21

смерти нет (с)
я должна его выучить. текст огромный...
у мя на компе 2Гига всего... свободных чуть меньше 200мб.. жрет неимоверно!

Расширенная форма

Редактировать

Подписаться на новые комментарии